洛伊斯的例子表明，纪念“战争亡灵”是希腊文明的一个重要特征，即使在大众化的雅典之外也是如此。“民主雅典人在纪念战争死难者的传统中看到了一种本质上属于雅典的东西，一种本质上属于民主的东西。寡头的演员,同时,从事客观非常相似的行为,或者是雅典纪念碑纪念non-Athenians,并不意味着那些雅典人欺骗他们的信仰,但显示了,相反,在多大程度上纪念的意义这样不固定的纪念碑纪念碑本身的性质,但其形状来自变化的环境中。“6”的法则在古希腊战争”,发表在《法律和历史评论卷。26日,3号,法律、战争和历史(2008年秋天,),作者Adriaan穆伦论述了法律,主要是不言而喻的,治理城邦之间的战争(城邦)在古代希腊,和检查这些法律在多大程度上影响这些城邦采取的策略和行动。兰尼把这个问题分成四个组成部分。首先，这些法律是如何形成的?大多数管理州际战争的法律都源于“对所有人都适用的法律”，即大多数公民本质上是依据这些法律行事的，而不是制定或成文的法律。这些法律往往是当时宗教思想的产物。
澳洲哲学作业代写:战争亡灵
Lowes examples indicate that commemoration of the “war-dead” was an important feature of Greek civilization even outside of the popularized Athens. “Democratic Athenians saw in their traditions of commemorating their war-dead something intrinsically Athenian and something intrinsically democratic. The fact that the oligarchic Thespians were, simultaneously, engaged in objectively very similar practices, or that the Athenian monuments also commemorated non-Athenians, does not mean that those Athenians were deluded in their beliefs, but shows, rather, the extent to which the meanings of commemorative monuments of this sort are not fixed by the nature of the monuments themselves, but derive their shape from the changing contexts in which they are found.” 6 In “The Laws of War in Ancient Greece”, published in Law and History Review, Vol. 26, No. 3, Law, War, and History (Fall, 2008), pp.469-489, author Adriaan Lanni discusses the laws, mostly unspoken, governing war between the polis (city-states) in classical Greece, and examines to what extent these laws affected the tactics and actions taken by these city-states. Lanni breaks the question down into four constituent elements.Firstly, how were these laws formed? Most of the laws governing interstate war stemmed from “laws common to all men”, that is laws that most citizens intrinsically acted regarding, not being formulated or written. Often these laws resulted from religious thinking at the time.