纵观历史，当权者都曾试图赢得选民的心和支持，通常是通过对历史事件的重新阐释或重新解读。1917年的俄国革命就是这样。布尔什维克和列宁，他们的领袖，试图用电影来改写革命的事件，以此来团结和统一俄罗斯的农民。导演谢尔盖·艾森斯坦是那些招募任务之一,而许多政府资助电影时间已经消失在大堆的劣质电影,尤其是他的两个作品,战舰波将金和十月,强大的框架俄国革命在全世界的目光和他自己的人。这些作品展示了电影的力量，甚至那些被认为包含了宣传元素的作品。在1917年革命之前，对沙皇政权的普遍不满情绪已经形成了敌意和爆发。在敖德萨举行的一场海军起义中，艾森斯坦选择了这样的一个事件，以显示在csars下工人阶级所需要的解放，他认为这是由布尔什维克后来提供的。从历史上看，这次事件是海员对军官的叛变，是1905年早期革命的重大事件。为了纪念1905年革命二十周年，苏联中央委员会委托艾森斯坦创作了一部电影，他最初策划了一系列的八部电影，形成了1905年的全景。然而，当面对共产主义定义的可行预算时.
澳洲食品科学作业代写:重新阐释或重新解读
Throughout history various persons and administrations in power have attempted to win the hearts and supports of their constituents, often through reframing or reinterpreting historical events in a light favourable to them. This was certainly the case in the Russian Revolution of1917. The Bolsheviks and Lenin, their leader, sought to use film to recast events of the revolution in such a way as to rally and unify the Russian peasantry. Filmmaker Sergei Eisenstein was one of those recruited for the task, and while many government-sponsored films of the time have disappeared into the massive pile of poor quality filmmaking, two of his works in particular, Battleship Potemkin and October, were powerful in framing the Russian Revolution in the eyes of the world and his own people. These works demonstrate the power of film, even those recognised as containing elements of propaganda. Hostility and outbreaks had been building prior to the1917 Revolution, with general dissatisfaction for the Tsarist regime. One such event, a naval uprising in Odessa, was chosen by Eisenstein to show the liberation needed by the working class under the csars, which he considered had been subsequently provided by the Bolsheviks. Historically, the event was a mutiny of the seamen against the officers, and had been a major event in the earlier Revolution of 1905. Commissioned by the Soviet Central Committee to create a film commemorating the twentieth anniversary of the 1905 Revolution, Eisenstein originally planned a sweeping series of eight films, forming a panoramic view of 1905 events. However, when confronted with the communist definition of a workable budget