安乐死，也被称为帮助自杀，是把人从无望的疾病或难以忍受的忍受中解脱出来的行为。安乐死有两种基本类型。除了生命是从这些病人身上带走的这一事实外，主动和被动的过程是不同的。在这两种情况下，生命都是从患有无望的疾病的病人身上夺走的。然而，主动安乐死是一种用致命的输液方式处死病人的示范，它能迅速而轻松地通过。与此相反，被动安乐死指的是你杀死一个人的方式是拿走他生命中重要的东西。这可以是终止生命支持或立即退出医疗保健的形式。第二类故意灭绝是自愿的和非自愿的。自愿的蓄意灭绝是指处于死亡边缘的个人同意寻求安乐死。非自愿是指绝症患者不能同意，所以他们通过另一个人批准。综上所述，为了本文的目的，我将从功利的角度关注主动自愿安乐死。安乐死是一个社会问题，因为大多数人不同意个体，特别是处于极度痛苦中的晚期病人，应该能够结束他们的生命。如果病人自己不能同意，这也是极具争议的。关于安乐死有很多争论，围绕着安乐死是否应该合法展开。围绕安乐死的辩论包括许多宗教、治疗和社会方面的观点。
澳洲社会学论文代写:安乐死
Euthanasia, also called helped suicide, is the act of discharging a person from a hopeless malady or unbearable enduring. There are two principle types of euthanasia. Aside from the fact that life is taken from these patients, the process differs between active and passive forms. In both, life is taken from the patient who is suffering from a hopeless malady. However, active euthanasia is a demonstration of executing the individual by deadly infusion to bring about quick and effortless passing. In contrast to this, passive euthanasia is when you kill that person by taking away something significant they needed to live. This can be in the form of terminating one’s life support or withdrawing from medical care immediately.The second types of willful extermination are voluntary and non-voluntary. Voluntary willful extermination is the point in which the individual, who is at death’s door offers, agree to seek euthanasia. Non-voluntary is when the terminally ill is not able to give consent so they give the approval through another person. This all being said and for the purpose of this paper, I will be focusing on active-voluntary euthanasia from the utilitarian point of view. Euthanasia is a social problem because most people don’t agree that individuals, especially terminally ill patients in excruciating pain, should be able to end their lives. This is also extremely controversial if this patient cannot give consent for themselves. There is a great deal of debate encompassing euthanasia, which revolves around whether it ought to be lawful. The debate encompassing euthanasia includes numerous religious, therapeutic and sociologic perspectives.