澳洲南昆士兰大学论文代写:民族主义

民族主义,根据最被广泛接受的定义,是国家和民族的原则应该是相等的。它包括一个强大的一群人的识别与一个政治实体的定义在国家方面,即一个国家。通常,它是相信一个民族建国的权利,或者国籍状态应该局限于一个民族。我们检查下这个定义的state-seeking活动多民族国家和民族也建立和更多的种族单一民族国家的竞争,因为他们的领导人寻求合法权力,呼吁民众支持其政策的要求履行历史使命和文化身份的国家。[2]从这个角度来看,我们可以肯定地说,任何民族主义理论是神话的一部分强劲,美国。神话是纳粹意识形态认为犹太人和的基础上,也许,奥斯曼帝国意识形态和亚美尼亚人的基础。不管怎样的民族主义理论和活动不是建设性的东西。如果国家生活在一个社区可以“辞职”民族自我冲突解决的主要点。但是,到目前为止,任何国家紧密相连的民族自我民族记忆,任何国家倾向于创建原型和这个国家的领导人创造气氛对另一个民族的仇恨。这样的冲突是经常升级,成功地在多民族的国家。这个问题也与宗教的领域有关。主要民族主义冲突有其出口的国家有不同的信仰。这个想法可以就是实用的邻国格鲁吉亚的例子。作为一个国家不同的民族(天鹅,威望,Megrels等等)。它可能会执行一个种族冲突如前南斯拉夫。但是,到目前为止,有宗教统一(其中大部分来自东正教)他们保护的统一状态。一些学者提出的塞尔维亚民族主义政治项目即应用意识形态。但任何形式的民族主义理论应用的意识形态,因为它是一个强大的德国希特勒或从这海到那海亚美尼亚。在这两种情况下,当我们讲关于国家认同或政治影响,民族主义理论应该除了破坏性的。如今人类试图形成这样的政治结构,将不同民族团结甚至在不同的发展阶段。在20世纪初世界1/6的部分有一个统一的国家不同的国家拥有不同的背景和不同的宗教见解。但恩典政治意识形态和系统他们住“从此幸福地生活在一起”。这是一个伟大的共产主义神话对所有国家的幸福感似乎无论如何是建设性的。后来欧洲国家创建另一个模型没有从苏联到目前为止。也许人们更喜欢住在社区(如欧盟或其他)多单独生活在冲突。

澳洲南昆士兰大学论文代写:民族主义

Nationalism, according to the most widely accepted definition, is the doctrine that the state and the nation should be congruent. It involves a strong identification of a group of individuals with a political entity defined in national terms, i.e. a nation. Often, it is the belief that an ethnic group has a right to statehood, or that citizenship in a state should be limited to one ethnic group. We examine under this definition both the state-seeking activity of ethnic groups in multi-ethnic states and also the rivalries of established and more ethnically homogeneous nation-states, insofar as their leaders seek to legitimate their power and appeal for popular support for their policies by claiming to fulfill the historical mission or cultural identity of the nation. [2] From this point of view we can say for sure that any nationalistic theory is a part of myth about strong and united state. That myth was the basis of Nazi ideology regarded Jews and, perhaps, the basis of Ottoman ideology and Armenians. Anyhow nationalistic theory and activity is something which is not constructive. If nations living in one community can “resign” their ethnic self it will be the main point in conflict resolution. But, so far as, ethnic self of any nation is closely connected to the ethnic memory, any nation tends to create stereotypes and the leaders of that nation create the atmosphere of hatred toward another ethnic group. Such kind of conflicts is escalated very often and successfully in polyethnic states. This problem is also related to the sphere of religion. Main nationalistic conflicts have their outlet in countries with different belief. This idea can be well-applied to the example of neighboring Georgia. As a state of different ethnic groups (Swans, Cachets, Megrels, etc.) it is likely to perform an ethnic conflict such as former Yugoslavia. But, so far as, there is religious unity (most part of them are from Orthodox Church) they preserve the unity of their state. Some scholars present an idea of Serbian nationalism to be a political project i.e. an applied ideology. But any kind of nationalistic theory is an applied ideology as it was in the case of strong Germany of Hitler or from sea to sea Armenia. In both cases when we speak either about national identity or political impact, nationalistic theory should stand apart from being destructive. Nowadays humanity tries to form such kind of political structures which will unite different peoples even on different stages of development. In the beginning of 20th century on the 1/6 part of the world there was a country which united different nations with different backgrounds and different religious insights. But grace à political ideology and system they lived “happily ever after”. It was a great communist myth about well-being of all nations which seems anyhow be constructive. Later European countries create another model which is not so far from the Soviet one. Perhaps people prefer to live in community (such as EU or other) more than live separately and in conflicts.

如果你在昆士兰这个美丽的城市读书，需要学术难题，论文作业代写可以联系我们的 布里斯班论文代写服务