最后，艾伦总结了他的整个观点，他解释说，年龄在决定利益方面很重要，并最终解释了年老和低价值利益的劣势。随着年龄的增长，你的福利价值会降低。他在结论中承认，他更喜欢年轻人的福利，而不是他的。同样，在我们的替代模型中，年龄也会有一些影响，但它不会改变我们的决定。如果我们的医疗保健系统是基于本文提出的模型，那么确定福利价值的标准就会大不相同。一些偏好可能是由于年龄的关系，但在主要阶段的基本原理范围内，要么是生成的，要么是退化的。在这篇评论中，我尽我最大的努力来反映我对艾伦的辩论的理解，尽管他多次反驳他自己的立场，但以年龄作为衡量健康益处的标准。他的主题的反身性可以出现在我建议的健康护理设置模型中，在那里我尽我最大的努力创造一个平行的主题与艾伦的论点，以便更好地理解他的想法。基于生成和退化治疗的医疗保健设置的建议模型的概念，关于死亡和生命极限的神圣参考是我个人的概念和信仰。在解释中，我试图创建一个并行上下文来进行比较。
澳洲莫纳什论文代写:低价值利益劣势
Concluding his whole proposition, Alan explains that Age is important in determining the benefits and ultimately explains the disadvantages7 of being elder and low value benefits. As the age increase the value of your benefits decreases. He admits in his conclusion that he would have been preferring younger person benefits6 over his.Similarly, age matters a little bit in our alternative model but not as much that it can change the decisions. If our health care system is based on the suggested model of this paper, the criterion for determining the values of benefits would have been very different. Some preference could have been involved due to age but within the rationale of main phase either generative or degenerative.In this commentary I try my best to reflect my understanding of Alan’s debate, although he counters argue his own position many times but within the connotation of Age as criterion to determine health benefits. Reflexivity of his theme can appear to my suggested model of health care setting, where I am trying my best to create a parallel theme to Alan’s argument in order to get more grasp on his ideas. Concept of suggested model for health care setting based on generative and degenerative treatments, divine references about death and limits of life is my personal conception and believes. Within the explanation I have tried to create a parallel context for comparison.