澳洲犯罪学论文代写:支持惩罚

其他学者将报应理论作为支持死刑的基础。报应理论的支持者认为，从根本上说，罪犯应该受到与所犯罪行相称的惩罚。比例刑理论虽然其根本依据是报应是一种具有遏制犯罪倾向潜力的理性方法，但也引发了一些相互矛盾的观点。报应一般是正义的概念，不同于基于仇恨情绪的报复。基于报应的方法，实施死刑的凶手得到了应有的惩罚，这在《刑法》中有所体现。为什么社会应该强迫罪犯呆在监狱里，为他们的食物、住所和安全买单?由于大多数受害者和公众生活在一种恐惧的环境中，每当这些罪犯通过非法越狱或司法释放而逍遥法外时，情况就变得复杂起来。有观点认为，连环杀手和杀人凶手在过去犯下了更多的罪行，从拘留所逃脱。死刑的支持者认为，惩罚杀人犯最有效的方法是将他们处以死刑。同样，死刑的支持者认为，面临死刑的罪犯会得到公正的审判，上诉程序对罪犯是仁慈的，而不是受害者所经历的折磨。罪犯有机会上诉和作最后的愿望;受害者没有这样的乐趣。

澳洲犯罪学论文代写:支持惩罚

Other scholars use the retribution theory is the basis for supporting the death penalty. Under the retribution theory, the proponents argue that fundamentally, criminals deserve punishment that is proportionate to the offense committed. The theory of proportional punishment has elicited contradicting perspectives although the fundamental basis is that retribution is a rational approach which has the potential to deter criminal tendencies. Retribution is generally a concept of justice and is different from revenge which is based on emotions of hatred. Based on the retribution approach, the murderer put on death penalty gets a deservedly punishment as reflected in the lex talionis. Why the society should be forced to keep criminals in jails and prisons paying for their foods, their shelter and security. Matters get complicated given that most victims and the general public live in in an environment of fear whenever such criminals are loose either by unlawful escape from custody or judicial release from custody. There are arguments that serial killers and murderous have escaped from custody in the past committing more crimes. The proponents of the death penalty argue that the most effective way of punishing killers is to put them on the death penalty. Similarly, proponents of the death penalty argue that criminals facing death row are given fair trial and the appeal processes is kind to convicts as opposed to the ordeals that the victims go through. The convicts have the opportunity to appeal and make last wishes; the victims have no such pleasure.