我们的信念必须在多大程度上基于理性的理由?这些知识问题是基于规定的主要问题”到什么程度我们需要证据来支持我们的信念在不同领域的知识?“特别强调“需要”一词具有讽刺意味的是在问题的信念可能是非理性的,可能不需要证据来支持它。这是宗教的知识领域。人们可能会寻求宗教,因为各种原因,因为他们带来了二次知识从他们的父母让他们相信神的力量,因为文化背景,寻找生活的目的或简单地找到安慰,有一个死后的生活。我举个例子,作为天主教徒长大我的祖父母和父母,我是上帝的信徒,我的猎物几乎每天晚上,我没有任何证据,相信上帝,但它安慰我认为某人有可能保护我,听我。事实上唯一来源的证据支持宗教是《圣经》。
埃迪斯科文大学论文代写:问题
To what extent must our beliefs be based on rational grounds? This knowledge issue is based on the main prescribed question “To what extent do we need evidence to support our beliefs in different areas of knowledge?” emphasising specifically on the word “need” the irony in the question is that a belief may be irrational, and may not need evidence to support it. This is the case of the knowledge area of Religion. People may seek religion because of various reasons, because they were brought up with secondary knowledge from their parents who made them believe in a divine power, because of cultural backgrounds, in a search for purpose of life or simply to find comfort that there is a life after death. I for example, was brought up as a catholic by my grandparents and parents, I am a believer of God and I prey almost every night, I don’t have any evidence to believe in God, but it comforts me to think that someone up there maybe protects me and listens to me. In fact the only source of evidence in favour of religion is the bible.