跳到主要内容

澳洲商科assignment代写 违规行为

作为工程师,我们相信对于这三种违规行为最有效的解决方案和预防措施应该是更清晰的沟通方式。是否员工坚持他的经理越来越为普遍公众的安全,或者他的老板控股更开放的“办公时间“,这样沟通就可以在一段时间内处理30分钟,而不仅仅是在一个冲会议“简报”与“讨论”这件事。员工还担心,如果他们不能按时完成技术期限,就会失去工作。这就造成了沟通上的差距,因为员工太害怕站出来捍卫正确的东西,因为他们只能把个人安全置于普遍安全之上。解决这一问题的办法是在生产这些产品时将健康和安全放在首位。如果员工知道他们说出正确的事情不会有风险,那么他们就会更倾向于支持正确的事情,因为这样做不会危及他们的个人安全和福祉。由于雇主和员工沟通的桥梁薄弱,他们也制造了一个问题,即双方在新闻媒体上表达自己的误解。在公众眼中,这是极其不专业的行为,也清楚地表明在沟通公共安全问题时存在着多么大的差距。这种差距表明,公众在生产产品时对安全问题的重视程度是多么低。这种不专业的作风给公司带来了更坏的名声。如果双方的沟通渠道更清晰(面对面交谈并一起解决问题让他们感到很自在),那么公开的消极对抗也可以避免。

澳洲商科assignment代写 违规行为

As engineers, we believe the most efficient solution(s) and preventative measures for all three breaches of conduct would have been a clearer means of communication. Whether it is the employee persisting with his manager more and standing up for the universal public’s safety, or if it is his boss holding more open “office hours” so that communication can be handled over a period of time and not just in a single thirty-minute rushed session of “briefing” versus “discussing” the matter at hand. There is also a fear for employees of losing their jobs if they cannot meet a technical deadline on time. This creates a gap in communication since the employee is too scared to stand up for what is right as they can only prioritize personal security over universal safety. The solution to this is to prioritize health and safety above all when creating these products. If the employees know they are not at risk for voicing what is right then they will be more prone to standing up for it since their personal security and well-being is not put at risk for doing so. Due to the weak employer and employee bridge of communication, they also created an issue of the two of them voicing their miscommunication over news media. This looks extremely unprofessional in the public eye and makes it obvious of how far of a gap there was when communicating the matters of public safety. This kind of gap shows the public how lowly prioritized their safety was in the making of their product. The unprofessionalism creates even worse publicity for the company. If the line of communication was clearer between the two (where they felt comfortable talking to each other face-to-face and solving issues together as such), then the public passive-aggressive confrontation could have been prevented as well.

本段内容来自网络 并不是我们的写手作品 请勿直接剽窃,查重100%,造成后果与本站无关。如需定制论文请记得联系我们。

返回顶部