澳洲教育学论文代写:行动研究

行动研究与其他传统教育研究相似。这两类研究都提出了有关教育的问题，这些问题将解决问题，为变革和教育改革创造工具，并对教学和学习过程产生有价值的见解。行动研究模型的不同之处在于，行动研究包括教师作为变化的参与者、领导者和实施者。过程-产品模型和解释的缺点是它唯一关注的问题。德雷克斯勒写道，“合作写博客是培养基本的说明文写作技能的一种手段。”在这篇文章中，研究的目的是表明协作式博客可以提高学生的写作动机。通过调查，学生的态度被用来评估写作前后的态度。采用四步骤系统的数据分析过程进行数据的收集和分析。多样性被认为是无意的结果。这一重大发现表明，与大学或三年级学生的合作提高了学生在学校写作的积极态度和动力。博客和技术的使用应该更多地用于帮助学生收集、保留和吸收知识。更多地使用交互式工具来帮助学生学习和记住概念将使学生受益。

澳洲教育学论文代写:行动研究

Action research studies are similar to other traditional educational research studies. Both types of research pose questions about education that will solve a problem, create a vehicle for change and educational reform, and generate valuable insights into the teaching and learning process. The differences in the action research model is that Action Research includes the teacher as a participant, leader, and implementer of change. The weaknesses of the process-product model and the interpretive is its single focused question.Drexler, wrote “Collaborative Blogging as a Means to Develop Elementary Expository Writing Skills.” In this article, the purpose of the study was to show that collaborative blogging would improve student’s motivation to write. Students attitude via surveys were used to assess before and after attitudes toward writing. A four-step systematic data analysis process was used to conduct, collect, and analyze data. Diversity was addressed as an unintentional result. The major finding indicated that collaboration with college/third grade students increased positive attitudes and motivation towards writing at school. Blogging and the use of technology should be used more to help student gather, retain, and assimilate knowledge. Students would benefit from more use of interactive tools to help them learn and retain concepts.